eg-0399

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
        "@id": "#issue",
        "@type": "PublicationIssue",
        "issueNumber": "5",
        "datePublished": "2012",
        "isPartOf": {
            "@id": "#periodical",
            "@type": [
                "PublicationVolume",
                "Periodical"
            ],
            "name": "Cataloging & Classification Quarterly",
            "issn": [
                "1544-4554",
                "0163-9374"
            ],
            "volumeNumber": "50",
            "publisher": "Taylor & Francis Group"
        }
    },
    {
        "@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
        "isPartOf": "#issue",
        "description": "The library catalog as a catalog of works was an infectious idea, which together with research led to reconceptualization in the form of the FRBR conceptual model. Two categories of lacunae emerge--the expression entity, and gaps in the model such as aggregates and dynamic documents. Evidence needed to extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary research on instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community is to begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system, adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR model.",
        "sameAs": "https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254",
        "about": [
            "Works",
            "Catalog"
        ],
        "pageEnd": "368",
        "pageStart": "360",
        "name": "Be Careful What You Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review",
        "author": "Smiraglia, Richard P."
    }
  ]
}

<!-- An article, fully linked to the issue, volume, and periodical in which it was published -->
<div vocab="https://schema.org/" typeof="ScholarlyArticle" resource="#article">
  <strong>Title:</strong> <span property="name">Be Careful What You Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review</span><br />
  <strong>Author:</strong> <span property="author">Smiraglia, Richard P.</span><br />
  <strong>Subjects:</strong> <span property="about">Catalog</span> ; <span property="about">Works</span> <br />
  <strong>Is Part Of:</strong>
  <div property="isPartOf" typeof="PublicationIssue" resource="#issue">
    <span typeof="Periodical" resource="#periodical">
      <span property="name">Cataloging &amp;amp; Classification Quarterly</span>,
    </span>
    <span property="datePublished">2012</span>,
    Vol.<span property="isPartOf" typeof="PublicationVolume" resource="#periodical"><span
              property="volumeNumber">50</span></span>(<span
          property="issueNumber">5</span>),
  </div>
  <div>
    p.<span property="pageStart">360</span>-<span property="pageEnd">368</span> [Peer Reviewed Journal]<br />
    <strong>Description:</strong>
    <span property="description">The library catalog as a catalog of works
      was an infectious idea, which together with research led to
      reconceptualization in the form of the FRBR conceptual model. Two
      categories of lacunae emerge—the expression entity, and gaps in the
      model such as aggregates and dynamic documents. Evidence needed to
      extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary research on
      instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community is to
      begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system,
      adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present
      special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR
      model.</span>
  </div>
  <span resource="#periodical">
    <strong>Publisher:</strong>
    <span property="publisher">Taylor &amp;amp; Francis Group</span><br />
    <strong>Source:</strong> Routledge, Taylor &amp;amp; Francis Group<br />
    <strong>ISSN</strong> <span property="issn">0163-9374</span> ;<br />
    <strong>E-ISSN</strong> <span property="issn">1544-4554</span> ;<br />
  </span>
  <strong>DOI:</strong>
  <a property="sameAs" href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254">10.1080/01639374.2012.682254</a>
</div>

<!-- An article, fully linked to the issue, volume, and periodical in which it was published -->
<div itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle">
  <strong>Title:</strong> <span itemprop="name">Be Careful What You Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review</span><br />
  <strong>Author:</strong> <span itemprop="author">Smiraglia, Richard P.</span><br />
  <strong>Subjects:</strong> <span itemprop="about">Catalog</span> ; <span itemprop="about">Works</span> <br />
  <strong>Is Part Of:</strong>
  <div itemprop="isPartOf" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemid="#issue">
    <span itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Periodical" itemid="#periodical">
      <span itemprop="name">Cataloging &amp;amp; Classification Quarterly</span>,
    </span>
    <span itemprop="datePublished">2012</span>,
    Vol.<span itemprop="isPartOf" itemscope
              itemtype="https://schema.org/PublicationVolume"><link
              itemprop="isPartOf" href="#periodical" /><span
              itemprop="volumeNumber">50</span></span>(<span
          itemprop="issueNumber">5</span>),
  </div>
  <div>
    p.<span itemprop="pageStart">360</span>-<span itemprop="pageEnd">368</span> [Peer Reviewed Journal]<br />
    <strong>Description:</strong>
    <span itemprop="description">The library catalog as a catalog of works
      was an infectious idea, which together with research led to
      reconceptualization in the form of the FRBR conceptual model. Two
      categories of lacunae emerge—the expression entity, and gaps in the
      model such as aggregates and dynamic documents. Evidence needed to
      extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary research on
      instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community is to
      begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system,
      adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present
      special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR
      model.</span>
  </div>
  <span itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Periodical" itemid="#periodical">
    <strong>Publisher:</strong>
    <span itemprop="publisher">Taylor &amp;amp; Francis Group</span><br />
    <strong>Source:</strong> Routledge, Taylor &amp;amp; Francis Group<br />
    <strong>ISSN</strong> <span itemprop="issn">0163-9374</span> ;<br />
    <strong>E-ISSN</strong> <span itemprop="issn">1544-4554</span> ;<br />
  </span>
  <strong>DOI:</strong>
  <a itemprop="sameAs" href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254">10.1080/01639374.2012.682254</a>
</div>

<!-- An article, fully linked to the issue, volume, and periodical in which it was published -->
<div>
  <strong>Title:</strong> Be Careful What You Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review<br />
  <strong>Author:</strong> Smiraglia, Richard P.<br />
  <strong>Subjects:</strong> Catalog ; Works <br />
  <strong>Is Part Of:</strong>
  <div>Cataloging &amp;amp; Classification Quarterly, 2012, Vol. 50 (5),</div>
  <div>p.360-368 [Peer Reviewed Journal]<br />
    <strong>Description:</strong>
      The library catalog as a catalog of works
      was an infectious idea, which together with research led to
      reconceptualization in the form of the FRBR conceptual model. Two
      categories of lacunae emerge—the expression entity, and gaps in the
      model such as aggregates and dynamic documents. Evidence needed to
      extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary research on
      instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community is to
      begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system,
      adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present
      special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR
      model.
  </div>
  <strong>Publisher:</strong> Taylor &amp;amp; Francis Group<br />
  <strong>Source:</strong> Routledge, Taylor &amp;amp; Francis Group<br />
  <strong>ISSN</strong> 0163-9374 ;<br />
  <strong>E-ISSN</strong> 1544-4554;<br />
  <strong>DOI:</strong>
  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254">10.1080/01639374.2012.682254</a>
</div>